For those who seek Ministerial Intervention for a more favorable decision regarding their Visa applications that has been refused by the Department of Home Affairs.
Statement of Faith: We aim to provide Australian Immigration advice and assistance without discrimination on any grounds whatsoever.
Under Sections 351, 415 and 501J of the 'Migration Act 1958', the Minister has power to replace a decision of a merits review tribunal on a person’s case with a decision that is more favourable to that person, if the Minister thinks it is in the public interest to do so.
Section 351: Allows the minister to substitute a decision of the tribunal with a more favourable decision. The more favourable decision does not have to be one that the tribunal had the power to make.
Section 415: Allows the minister to substitute the tribunal’s decision with a more favourable decision where the minister considers this is in the public interest. A non-citizen can request the minister to consider exercising this power. However, when a request is made, the minister does not have a duty to consider exercising this power.
Section 501J: Where the AAT has refused a person a Protection Visa, the minister may set aside that decision and substitute it with a positive decision where they consider that doing so is in the public interest. It is not a requirement that the more favourable decision must be a decision that the AAT had the power to make. When exercising their discretionary powers, the minister must provide reasons for their determination to both houses of parliament.
It is not necessary that your request for ministerial intervention will be referred to the Minister. The Minister does not have to look at your case and does not have to intervene. Most requests are finalised by the Department in accordance with the Minister’s guidelines. Only a small number of requests are referred to the Minister.
The Minister’s guidelines describe the types of cases that might be referred for the Minister’s consideration. Ministerial staff assess all requests against these guidelines, and requests that do not meet the guidelines will be finalised by us. Most requests do not meet the guidelines and are not referred to the Minister. The Minister has described the types of unique or exceptional circumstances in which a case might be referred for the Minister’s consideration. The Minister’s guidelines indicate that certain cases that do not meet the guidelines for referral are inappropriate to consider. The Minister has described the circumstances of these cases in the guidelines. The Minister expects us to finalise such requests without further processing.
Ministerial intervention is not part of the visa process and very few requests for ministerial intervention are successful. If your request is unsuccessful, and there are no other immigration matters ongoing, then you are expected to leave Australia as soon as possible.
The Minister has issued guidelines on the type of unique and exceptional circumstances that could be brought to the Minister's attention. Next section describes circumstances inappropriate to consider for Ministerial Intervention.
- Strong compassionate circumstances that if not recognised would result in serious, ongoing and irreversible harm and continuing hardship to an Australian citizen or an Australian family unit, where at least one member of the family is an Australian citizen or Australian permanent resident.
- Compassionate circumstances regarding your age and/or health and/or psychological state, that if not recognised would result in serious, ongoing and irreversible harm and continuing hardship.
- Exceptional economic, scientific, cultural or other benefit that would result from you being permitted to remain in Australia.
- Circumstances not anticipated by relevant legislation; or clearly unintended consequences of legislation; or the application of relevant legislation leads to unfair or unreasonable results in your case.
- You cannot be returned to your country/countries of citizenship or usual residence due to circumstances outside your control.
If your case does not meet the guidelines for referral and which have the types of circumstances described below are inappropriate for the Minister to consider. If your case has one or more of these circumstances, your application will be finalised without referral to the Minister and you or your authorised representative will be advised of it in writing.
- The request is made by a person who is not the subject of the request or their authorised representative;
- The person is in the community and: is an unlawful non-citizen and remains an unlawful non-citizen throughout the course of their Ministerial intervention request; and does not cooperate in ensuring that a valid travel document is available (or has not satisfied the Department that they are stateless).
- The person has been found not to satisfy a fraud-related Public Interest Criterion for the grant of a visa.
- The person’s visa has been cancelled because they breached their visa conditions.
- The person has had a visa refused because they did not comply with the conditions of a previous visa.
- The person has been refused a visa or has had a visa cancelled on character grounds.
- The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) has determined that the person is a direct or indirect risk to national security through issuing the person with an Adverse Security Assessment (ASA) which remains in effect.
- The person could apply for a Partner visa onshore but is subject to a visa condition 8503 (which specifies that after entering Australia, the person cannot be granted another substantive visa other than a protection visa while they remain in Australia) and a request for a waiver of that condition has not been sought or decided.
- The person may be able to apply for a Partner visa onshore, as prescribed under regulation 2.12(1) of the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
- The person’s application for a Partner visa onshore, as prescribed under regulation 2.12(1) of the Regulations, has been refused and the person is now barred from applying for a Partner visa onshore.
- The person has left Australia.
- The person has an ongoing application for a substantive visa (either onshore or offshore) with the Department.
- The person has an ongoing application for merits review of a visa decision with a relevant review tribunal.
- The person has had a remittal or a set aside decision from a relevant review tribunal or a court.
- The person’s review tribunal decision was in relation to the refusal or cancellation of a Bridging visa E.
- The person has an ongoing ministerial intervention request under any of the powers covered by these guidelines.
- A Notice of intention to remove has been issued to the person and the ministerial intervention request has not been initiated by the Department.
- The person holds a Bridging visa E with visa condition 8512 which specifies that the person must leave Australia by a specified date.
- The request raises claims only in relation to Australia’s non refoulement obligations..
Under Sections 351, 415 and 501J of the 'Migration Act 1958', the Minister has power to replace a decision of a merits review tribunal on a person’s case with a decision that is more favourable to that person, if the Minister thinks it is in the public interest to do so.
When you become a standard business sponsor you can sponsor someone to work for you on a Temporary Skill Shortage Visa Subclass 482; or Skilled Employer Sponsored Regional (Provisional) Visa Subclass 494.
Notice of Intention to Consider Cancellation a visa may be issued to anyone who holds an Australian visa, if there appears to be grounds to cancel a visa as prescribed by Migration Act 1958. The notice will give you adverse information it has received and will give you an opportunity to comment on the information.
The Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) can review some decisions about visas made under the Migration Act 1958 by the Department of Home Affairs or the Minister/s of the Department such as; refuse or cancel different types of visas, refuse to approve a nomination of an occupation, activity or position, to bar, refuse to approve or cancel the approval of a sponsor, or relating to requiring a security.
The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA) can review certain types of decisions under the 'Migration Act 1958' made by the 'Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs', 'Minister for Home Affairs', the 'Department of Home Affairs', the 'Administrative Appeals Tribunal', and the 'Immigration Assessment Authority'.
When can a Migration decision affirmed by the AAT-MRD and Federal Circuit Court be appealed at Federal Court which in most matters will be final court of appeal.
We acknowledge the traditional custodians of country throughout Australia and their continuing connection to land, sea and community. We pay our respects to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, their cultures; and to their Elders of past and present.
We are independent consulting entities which are not associated in any way with the Australian ‘Department of Home Affairs’ (DOHA). Information on this website does not constitute personal migration advice. For a customized migration advice based on your personal circumstances, please call and talk to one of our Immigration Consultants or register your interest with our Associates.
